DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON. VA 22204-2490
SIN
Docket No: 3819-14
8 April 2015
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 April 2015. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of
error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable:to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
On 12 August 1991, you reenlisted in the Navy after serving over
four years of satisfactory service. on 5 February 1996, you were
medically evaluated and diagnosed with a dependent personality
disorder that manifested a longstanding disorder of character and
behavior which was of such severity as to render you incapable of
serving adequately in the Navy. Further, you were judged to
represent a danger to yourself and others if retained.
On 28 February 1996, you were notified of pending administrative
separation action due to your diagnosed personality disorder.
* You elected to waive the rights to consult counsel, submit a
statement or have your case heard by an administrative discharge
board (ADB). On 10 July 1996, your commanding officer forwarded
you case to the separation authority recommending your
separation. On 19 March 1996, the separation authority concurred
and directed that you be separated. You received an honorable
discharged on 29 March 1996. At that time, you were assigned a
RE-4 reentry code and JFX separation code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your record of service and desire to change your reentry and
separation codes. Nevertheless, the Board found that these
factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reentry
or separation codes given the diagnosis of a dependent
personality disorder, and the fact that you represented a danger
to yourself and others. Finally, an RE-4 reentry code and JFX
separation code is routinely assigned under such circumstances.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board‘s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
OBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6612 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your — application on 8 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official “naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1630 14
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service given your diagnoses of a personality disorder, and suicidal ideation, | Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05629-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 October 1995 at age 17 and served without disciplinary incident.On 4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01959-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2011. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08886-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals who are separated due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06785-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06902-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08381-02
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06007-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2011. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code or narrative reason for separation given the diagnosis of a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05081-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board concluded that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals who are separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder and adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval recerd, the burden"is on the...